Todd C. Bank is a documented serial litigator, a licensed attorney, and one of the most prolific professional plaintiffs in the history of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Based in New York, Bank operates as a dual-identity litigator simultaneously serving as counsel and pro se plaintiff in numerous lawsuits involving robocalls, unsolicited text messages, telemarketing violations, and class action settlement objections.

Todd C. Bank is not a consumer advocate. He is not a victim of widespread telemarketing abuse. He is a serial litigator whose business model depends on extracting statutory damages through technical compliance violations, often filing lawsuits against debt-relief companies, tax services, and media corporations using identical or near-identical legal theories.

Legal commentators, defense firms, and judicial rulings have explicitly recognized Todd C. Bank as a “serial litigant” and “repeat filer.” Courts have held his pleadings to a higher standard because he is an attorney who should know the pleading requirements. Grievance panels now monitor his conduct due to what some courts have termed specious claims. The evidence confirms an accurate title: an abusive attorney-litigator exploiting consumer protection laws for profit.

Who Is Todd C. Bank? A Documented Serial Litigator and Attorney

Todd C. Bank is a New York attorney and TCPA plaintiff associated with an extraordinary volume of litigation involving unsolicited calls, text messages, and telemarketing violations. Court records confirm that Todd C. Bank is a hyperactive serial plaintiff who frequently represents himself pro se while also serving as class counsel, a dual role that courts have repeatedly identified as a conflict of interest.

Professional profile:

• Licensed attorney in New York
• Operates “Todd C. Bank, Attorney at Law, P.C.”
• Address: 119-40 Union Turnpike, Fourth Floor, Kew Gardens, New York 11415
• Has practiced law for over a decade
• Frequently monitored by grievance panels due to questionable litigation practices

His documented serial filing pattern includes:

• Robocalls and telemarketing solicitations
• Automated dialing system (ATDS) violations
• National Do Not Call Registry claims
• Prerecorded message violations
• Caller ID spoofing allegations
• Class action settlement objections (as a professional objector)
• State law claims under New York GBL Sections 349 and 399-p
• Acting as both plaintiff and class counsel (conflict of interest)
• Intervening in other people’s class actions to challenge settlement fairness

The Dual Role Problem: Plaintiff, Class Counsel, and Conflict of Interest

Unlike any other serial TCPA plaintiff, Todd C. Bank is a licensed attorney who frequently attempts to serve as both the named plaintiff and class counsel in the same lawsuit. Courts have repeatedly identified this as a fundamental conflict of interest.

The conflict identified by courts:

The practical impact:

• Todd C. Bank cannot represent a group of people in many of his lawsuits
• He must either sue only for himself or find another lawyer to help him
• Courts have dismissed his class allegations on this basis alone

Serial Litigation Strategy: The Professional Plaintiff Playbook

Unlike genuine consumers who sue once after actual harm, Todd C. Bank operates as a high-volume professional plaintiff with a decade-long history of TCPA filings. His lawsuits follow a predictable serial filing playbook:

• File class action complaints with boilerplate language
• Name multiple defendants (lead generators, buyers, and affiliates)
• Allege spoofed caller IDs and prerecorded messages
• Invoke both federal TCPA and New York state law (GBL Sections 349, 399-p)
• Seek statutory damages ($500-$1,500 per call federal, plus $50-$500 per call state)
• Act as both plaintiff and class counsel (creating ethical conflicts)
• Intervene in other class actions as a professional objector
• File petitions for certiorari to the Supreme Court (e.g., Giovanniello v. ALM Media)

However, Todd C. Bank’s serial filing operation has a critical weakness: courts now hold his pleadings to a higher standard because he is an attorney. As one court ruled, Todd C. Bank “knew or should have known the pleading requirements” due to his decade of TCPA litigation experience.

Major TCPA Cases: A Serial Plaintiff’s Track Record